The Sunday workshops are a tradition at the IAFSS symposium. For the 12th symposium, five workshops will be arranged on Sunday afternoon June 11.
Each workshop will include a panel of experts that will engage with the audience discussing and debating the pertinent issues in the topic.
The workshop titles for the 12th symposium are:
- Quantification of Fire Effluent Toxicity
- Large Outdoor Fires and the Built Environment
- New approaches to evacuation modelling
- Global perspectives of Timber in high-‐rise buildings
- Better Linking Fire Safety Science and Fire Safety Engineering: Research Priorities for Fire Safety Engineering
Detailed information about the workshops can be Downloaded (PDF) or read via the links above.
Fire Emissions and Toxicity |
Workshop title |
Quantification of Fire Effluent Toxicity |
Workshop description |
Fire toxicity continues to be the neglected area of fire science. Robust determination of toxic product yields is now available, alongside equations predicting the physiological effects of fire toxicants on humans. In ISO 13571, the Available Safe Escape Time (ASET) can be predicted from the cumulative effect of each of the following four hazards: a) irritant gases b) asphyxiant gases c) visibility through smoke d) effects of heat
The first two will be considered in detail. Working to the endpoint where incapacitation occurs, such that the victim can no longer affect their own escape, the effect of each hazard as a function of time will be predicted. A second approach is based on lethality data where correlations need to be made to ensure that, instead of death being the outcome for 50% of the exposed population, the balance of probability is that all victims will be able to escape safely. In each case different safety margins need to be employed to ensure safe escape by occupants.
The workshop will cover specific examples, such as the burning of a single armchair in a typical UK living room and show how the victim will be incapacitated by smoke, irritants and asphyxiants, and the order in which those hazards occur. Methods for estimating the toxicity from other products, based on their Euro classification and toxic product yield will be discussed and examples used to see how such estimations may be performed.
The workshop goals are:
|
Who should attend? |
Fire safety engineers, fire safety scientists, scientists of related disciplines, regulators, toxicologists, plastics manufacturers |
Workshop leaders |
Anna A. Stec, University of Central Lancashire, UK |
Topic |
Wildland Fires |
Workshop title |
Large Outdoor Fires and the Built Environment |
Workshop description |
Large outdoor fires present risk to the built environment. One example often in the international media reports are wildfires that spread into communities, referred to as Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) fires. WUI fires have destroyed communities throughout the world and present an emerging problem in fire safety science. Another example are large urban fires that occur after earthquakes.
Historically, fire safety science research has spent a great deal of effort to understand fire dynamics within buildings. Research into large outdoor fires, and how to potentially mitigate the loss of structures in such fires, is far behind other areas of fire safety science research. This is due to the fact that fire spread in large outdoor fires is incredibly complex, involving the interaction of topography, weather, vegetation, and structures. At the same time, synergies between fire spread in WUI fires and urban fires have not been fully exploited. Once a wildland fire reaches a community and ignites structures, structure-structure fire spread occurs under similar mechanisms as in post-earthquake urban fire spread.
In this workshop, presentations will highlight large outdoor fires throughout the world and explore synergies between these fires. Specifically, each presentation will provide an overview of the large outdoor fire risk to the built environment from each region, and highlight critical research needs for this problem in the context of fire safety science.
The workshop will seek to develop the foundation for an international research needs roadmap to reduce the risk of large outdoor fires to the built environment. This workshop will also provide a forum for next generation researchers to contribute to this important topic. |
Who should attend? |
Fire safety engineers, fire safety scientists, scientists of related disciplines, regulators |
Workshop leader |
Samuel L. Manzello, NIST, USA
|
Topic |
Fire safety engineering |
Workshop title |
Better Linking Fire Safety Science and Fire Safety Engineering: Research Priorities for Fire Safety Engineering |
Workshop description |
Broadly, science is focused on understanding why things work, and engineers are focused on making things work. Engineers need scientists to produce knowledge and data they can apply, but scientists do not always know what the engineers need, and if they are focused on fundamental research, they likely do not care. In many cases, engineers rely on applied research to find answers for specific problems, but funding for applied research can be problematic. Arguably, engineers and scientists can work more symbiotically in an environment of use inspired basic science, as reflected in Pasteur’s Quadrant.
The interaction between fire scientists and fire safety engineers follows the general trend. Some fire science research is focused primarily on better understanding physical (social or other) phenomena, not particularly with any focus on how it might be used. Applied fire research is undertaken in various organizations, but in some cases it does not get to the broader engineering community, for proprietary or other reasons. Arguably, use-inspired fundamental fire research could yield better outcomes, as suggested by Croce some years ago.
About the time of Croce’s paper, several research agendas for fire safety were developed (e.g., SFPE, UEF, Fire Forum). However, it is not clear to what extent the identified research has been advanced, the gaps have been filled, and whether new use-inspired research needs exist. To explore the situation, the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) embarked in 2016 on review of where the fire research and engineering situation is at: what progress has been made, what gaps exist, and what the fire safety engineering community identifies as research needs to advance the profession. This was a start. Continued dialog is needed between fire safety engineers and fire scientists to better understand what research is possible, where it might come from, how it might be funded, and how it might be implemented into practice. Likewise, discussion is needed between fire scientists and fire safety engineers regarding barriers to implementation of research outcomes: if uptake is lacking, what are the reasons, and how can the barriers be overcome?
The aim of this workshop is to continue the dialog between fire safety engineers and the fire scientists, on whom they rely to provide foundational research, data and methodologies. This workshop will feature presentations by fire safety engineers and fire safety scientists on the real and perceived needs of the fire safety engineering profession, the abilities and potential timelines of fire safety science to address the needs, and how the fire safety science and engineering communities can work even more closely than they do today to address critical needs for engineering a more fire safe world. |
Who should attend? |
Fire safety engineers, fire safety scientists, scientists of related disciplines, regulators |
Workshop leaders |
Brian Meacham, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA
|